Ball, Stephen (Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology, Indiana University, Bloomington)

EFFECTIVENESS OF GEOPHYSICAL TECHNIQUES IN DETECTING CERTAIN CLASSES OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIAL


The relative effectiveness of magnetic surveys in detecting different classes of cultural material was evaluated with the excavation results from the Clampitt site (12 Lr 329). The Clampitt site, a late prehistoric Oliver phase village located on the East Fork of the White River in Lawrence county, Indiana, was excavated in 1991 and 1992 with support from the Indiana Historical Society, the Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology, and the Department of Anthropology, Indiana University. A 20 meter by 160 meter magnetic survey was conducted over the site in the spring of 1991 with a Geoscan FM36 gradiometer prior to the 1991 excavation. Information from that survey was incorporated into the excavation strategy used in 1991. The gradiometer successfully detected sub-surface pits rich in cultural materials, but was unsuccessful in the detection of a stockade trench that surrounded the village and pits that contained low densities of cultural material.

A SAS regression analysis was performed to determine what material or combination of materials were primarily responsible for the strength of the magnetic signal emanating from the detected features. Cultural materials recovered from these features, and included in the analysis, were pottery, fire- cracked rock, chert (much of which was heat-treated), and limestone. The results of the analysis are summarized in Table 1.

The regression analysis indicated that pottery was the only significant source of a feature's magnetic field strength. This agreed with a direct comparison of pottery weights between those features detected by the magnetic survey and those that were overlooked (see Table 2). Feature 3 was problematical; it had less of all classes of cultural materials than did its neighbor, Feature 6, which was not detected by the magnetic survey (see Figure 11). The only unique material recovered from Feature 3 was an intact geode found in the northern half of the pit. The geode was analyzed and found to have iron oxide inclusions located in cracks in its crust, which were the source of its higher magnetic susceptibility. The low amount of iron oxides in the other local rocks appears to explain their lack of significance in a feature's magnetic field strength. These results have implications for the future use of magnetic surveys on aceramic sites in south-central Indiana.



                        TABLE 1: ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE 


                           Sum of          Mean
     Source      DF        Squares         Square      FValue    Prob>F
     -------------------------------------------------------------------
     Model        4        8704.93154    2176.23288    7.817     0.0614
     Error        3  	   835.19721     278.39907
     C Total      7        9540.12875



             Root MSE       16.68530      R-square       0.9125
             Dep Mean       42.91250      Adj R-sq       0.7957
             C.V.           38.88213


                               Parameter Estimates


                         Parameter      Standard       T for H0:
       Variable  DF      Estimate       Error         Parameter=0     Prob > |T|
      ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

       INTERCEP   1     14.743221    11.90202399       1.239           0.3035
       POT        1      0.025794     0.00691353        3.731          0.0336
       CHERT      1      0.001579     0.02316588        0.068          0.9499
       FCR        1     -0.012625     0.04229773       -0.298          0.7848
       LIME       1      0.023262     0.05225092        0.445          0.6863




       Variable       DF      Tolerance
      ----------------------------------
       
       INTERCEP       1           - 
       POT            1      0.43930128
       CHERT          1      0.66423466
       FCR            1      0.09238805
       LIME           1      0.11318376




      TABLE 2: AMOUNT OF POTTERY RECOVERED IN EACH FEATURE


     UNDETECTED FEATURES                         DETECTED FEATURES

  GRAMS     FEATURE NUMBER                    GRAMS    FEATURE NUMBER
 -------   ----------------                  -------   ---------------
    0       33,36,42,43,44,46,58               17             3
    1       35,42                              159            31
    4       34                                 400            2
   23       56                                 473            49
   85        6                                 499            1
                                               544            32
                                               1992           30
                                               4083           27




[return to 1992 abstracts menu] [continue to next]


Created: July 25, 1996
URL: http://www.gbl.indiana.edu/home.html
Comments: webmaster@www.gbl.indiana.edu
Copyright 1996, Glenn Black Laboratory of Archaeology and The Trustees of Indiana University
Last updated: September 15, 2003