Justice, Noel D. (Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology, Indiana University, Bloomington)

CULTURAL-HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES OF THE MCKINLEY SITE


The McKinley site is located within Hamilton County, just south of Noblesville, Indiana. It is situated upon a major terrace overlooking the West Fork of the White River floodplain which is sometimes referred to as the Horse Shoe Prairie. The site lies on the south side of one of the oldest homes in the area. This house is reported to have been a connection for the underground railroad in early American History, before abolition. The house is now the home of the Third Phase Christian Center. From conversations with Reverend Violette and other local informants, it was learned that the original house foundation has a number of, now sealed, tunnels leading out from the basement toward the river and hollows located away from the McKinley site. The southern boundary of the site is difficult to determine due to housing development, although indications are that the southerly portion of the site was affected by this development.

Excavations conducted by Downey Raibourn and the late Jack Householder and under the direction of the late Glenn A. Black took place at the McKinley site from 1953-55 . More recently, excavations were conducted by members of the Indianapolis Amateur Archaeological Association (IAAA) between 1977 and 1979. The IAAA crew were assisted by Gary Ellis of the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology and John Richardson, W. Fredrick Limp and other personnel from the Glenn Black Laboratory of Archaeology. We would like to extend our gratitude to all those who have previously worked with the McKinley site. The late Jack Householder and the membership of the Indianapolis Amateur Archaeological Association were especially instrumental in recovering and preserving the material remains which are now housed at the Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology. Principal actors in that organization who were involved at the McKinley site include Tom Ciskowski, Nancy Ciskowski, Nancy Hendricks, Ted Spurgeon, Mary Boatright, Arnot Haubt, and many others.

The 1953-55 excavations are the focus of this presentation. The area of subsurface investigations covered about 2,000 square feet. Excavations units were taken to sterile soil and in some cases cultural deposits were found to extend to over three feet below the surface. Data from these excavations were analyzed as part of a Master's thesis by Robert Little at Indiana University in 1970. Some evidence of strati- graphic separation, as discerned by soil characteristics, was noted, and three zones of apparent occupation were identified and discussed in Little's thesis (Figure 6). Beginning at the present ground surface, an upper zone, Zone C, was coincident with the surface and plowzone. This zone contained sporadic Historic trash mixed with earlier cultural remains from prehistoric midden accumulation. Zone B was characterized by a very dark to black organic midden varying in thickness from several inches to two feet and indicative of a very intense occupation. Zone B contained possible post holes or molds, many overlapping features, and other indications of significant cultural activity. The midden contained significant quantities of fire-cracked rocks, sporadic mussel and snail shell, and faunal and floral remains.

The earliest and deepest zone, Zone A, consisted of discontinuous patches of biogenic, stained soil that was much lighter in color than the soil above it and which contained many fragmentary shells. Zone A varied widely in thickness to as much as two feet and had an uneven contact with the basically sterile terrace soil composed of clay and gravel. Zone A is interpreted as the basal portion of the midden and represents the ephemeral beginnings of the midden accumulation from prehistoric occupation in the form of staining from above through percolation. In some cases the excavators reported that the terrace soil was spotted with black soil and an occasional fleck of wood or nut charcoal. A deep trench made to contain a holding tank was excavated to a depth of six and one half feet on the site. This pit was examined and showed a substratum of several feet of sand and gravel. No cultural material was reported for this deep trench (Little 1970:56). In one area of the site, sand was encountered at three feet below the surface. This sand layer relates to a natural drainage or wash which was later filled with trash.

A wide range of cultural material was recovered from the site. There are over 350 projectile points which represent all time periods, beginning with the Early Archaic period. There are only a few indications of Riverton, other Terminal Archaic, and Early Woodland occupations which are suggested mainly by projectile points from surface collections. There is also evidence for a late prehistoric, Oliver phase occupation. Overall, a Late Archaic habitation is outstanding at the site; there are axes, atlatl weights, bone tools, and most cultural material relates to this component.

After studying the excavation reports and collection, it became apparent that Early and Middle Archaic projectile points were recovered during excavations within the midden deposits. For example, excavations produced several Kirk Corner Notched points which date from about 7000 B.C. There was a single Lake Erie Bifurcated point which has an Early Archaic age of about 6300 B.C. Also recovered were two projectile points classed as Godar and Raddatz Side Notched. These are known in the Midwest to date from 6000 to 4000 B.C. In addition, a large side scraper was also recovered. It is made of Muldraugh chert has even, pressure flaked edges and is associated with an Early Archaic tool kit. Littl's Master's thesis and the original field notes were consulted to determine if there is any record of in situ subsurface context for these materials. In all cases, indications of earlier cultural components were apparently disturbed by the subsequent Late Archaic use of the site.

Diagnostic artifacts of the upper midden from 0.8-1.2 feet below surface (b.s.) are dominated by McWhinney Heavy Stemmed projectile points (Figure 7 c,d) and those generally representative of the Late Archaic Stemmed cluster. These points were manufactured from local glacial gravel and imported cherts which were normally heat- treated and reduced to maximize the length of the finished product. Obviously heat-altered remnants of the pebble and block cortex or rind are present on large numbers of these points which can account for some of the hafting and shape variability observed on projectile points of this type. They are, nonetheless, artfully crafted with well-prepared and maintained blade edges. McWhinney points were intentionally produced using combinations of soft-hammer percussion and pressure- flaking and finished into an even lanceolate shape with a relatively thick biconvex cross- section. The basic McWhinney Heavy Stemmed manufacturing technology foreshadowed later developments and may have been the most significant progenitor of what is later recognized as Adena Ovate Base in the Early Woodland period. The original collections used to define the McWhinney Heavy Stemmed type are from archaeological sites located in southwestern Ohio in the vicinity of Cincinnati (Geistweit 1970; Vickery 1972). Although also diagnostic of the Late Archaic period, only a few Matanzas points are represented in the collection from the McKinley site excavation. Other artifacts typical of the upper midden include chert drills, granitic hammerstones, a chert hammer, a notched pebbles or net sinkers (Figure 7 b), and cut and shaped, bone and antler artifacts; some of which are awls and needles.

Cultural material from the 1.2-2.0 feet b.s. levels at McKinley site are generally reflective of the same occupations discussed above with McWhinney Heavy Stemmed dominating the chipped stone tool assemblage. There is no significant change in the basic inventory of cultural material. Items new to the inventory include what are often called antler projectile points. These are deer antler tines carved and abraded into shape with the interior spongy bone reamed out for hafting, presumably to a shaft of wood (Figure 7 e) . These were probably secured with glue made from processed vegetal or animal extracts or petroleum from natural seeps. A small fragment of polished bone was identified as a piece of an atlatl hook made from a deer antler tine; it is broken just below the projection of the hook (Figure 7 g). Atlatl hooks were made in much the same manner as antler projectile points. Each of the complete examples of atlatl hooks from other Late Archaic sites show a cut inset which formed the hook located near the narrow tip of the deer antler. This is the most vulnerable part of the hook which explains the condition of the illustrated fragment. James H. Kellar has discussed the origin and use of the atlatl in North America (Kellar 1955). This device was invented to add length to the arm and impart great power to the hand- thrown spear. Most of the information for such devices in the Eastern United States indicate that the atlatl was composite tool consisting of a handle and hook joined together with a wooden shaft. Finely polished and drilled stone weights, often called "bannerstones," were apparently added to the shaft. All of the atlatl weights from McKinley site were found on the surface and plowzone (see Redman and Justice, Figure 11, this publication). Other items from this part of the midden include bipitted stones or nutting stones, a partially d rilled shell bead, and burned clay. One piece of bone was broken across two drilled holes. There is also a single example of an intrusive late prehistoric pot sherd from above.

The cultural inventory of the lowest occupation levels, from below 2.0 feet b.s., once again shows a great deal of similarity to materials recovered from higher midden levels. Although bell pestles and a few hafted scrapers occur, the basic elements of the lithic tools and general cultural assemblage are unchanged. The few shell beads recovered show various stages of manufacture from a species of mussel (see Figure 7 h-i), and antler projectile points, a bone needle, and a nutting stone are present as well. A hook shaped fragment of bone has the attributes suggestive of a semi-finished fishhook (Figure 7 f). Although, mussel and snail shell was recovered throughout the midden, the highest frequency of these shells was noted within the deepest occupation levels of the site.

Conclusions and Discussion
Nearly all of the diagnostic cultural material from all levels of the McKinley site midden relates well to the Late Archaic period. In the Master's thesis by Litle (1970) comparisons of the McKinley Late Archaic assemblage were made to those of Indian Knoll Kentucky, and the Faulkner site in Illinois. This prompted a review of more current literature that defines a number of Middle to Late Archaic phases. These include the Helton phase of the Lower Illinois Valley (Cook 1976), material from the Black Earth site in southern Illinois (Jefferies 1987), Green River phase material of Kentucky which includes Indian Knoll (Webb 1946), the French Lick phase defined from excavations in the Patoka River Valley in Southern Indiana (Munson and Cook 1980; Cheryl Munson, personal communication), and the Maple Creek (Vickery 1976) and McWhinney phases (McHugh and Michael 1984) discussed in the literature for the area around Cincinnati, Ohio and west to the Falls of the Ohio region respectively. Information about individual sites in Indiana was obtained, including such notables as the McCain site in Dubois County (Miller 1941) and the Bluegrass site in Warrick County (Anslinger 1988, 1989; personal communication).

In reviewing the Indian Knoll report by Webb (1946), the obvious similarities are with the McKinley worked bone and shell bead assemblage. However, in essence, the basic traits such as antler projectile points, awls, cut antler, carved bone fishhooks and shell beads are not particularly exotic in any Middle to Late Archaic collection in the Midcontinent where there is good preservation of these materials. Nearly all of the phases and sites mentioned have a preponderance of Matanzas cluster or other projectile point types and have produced geometrically decorated bone pins. At McKinley site there are no good indications from the worked bone collection that decorated pins are present and McWhinney Heavy Stemmed projectile points dominate the lithic assemblage. Essentially, all salient cultural connections of the McKinley site are with Late Archaic sites further to the south and southeast and concentrated in the central Ohio Valley. McWhinney Heavy Stemmed projectile points are ubiquitous at sites such as Maple Creek and related sites near Cincinnati, Ohio referred to as "Central Ohio Valley Archaic" (Vickery 1976, 1980), sites in adjacent areas of northern Kentucky (Jefferies 1990:198-200), 12 Sw 99 in Switzerland County, Indiana (McHugh and Michael 1984), and Clark's Point, Elrod and related site components in the Falls of the Ohio region of Indiana and Kentucky (Guernsey 1939, 1942; Jansen 1977; Collins, ed. 1979). The reader is referred to Justice (1987:139) for a distribution map for the McWhinney Heavy Stemmed type.

Projectile points identified as McWhinney Heavy Stemmed are dominant and occur throughout the midden at the Maple Creek site. These points also occur in later levels of the site with occupations attributed to the Maple Creek phase (Vickery 1980:28). The assemblage reflects a range of McWhinney related variations in lithic technology among other identified projectile point types. Radiocarbon dates from the Maple Creek site suggest an age between 2750 and 1750 B.C. to possibly as late as ca. 1000 B.C. which would correspond to the end of the Maple Creek phase (Vickery 1972; 1976:141-143, Table 5; 1980; personal communication). Seven radiocarbon dates obtained from the Patriot site (12 Sw 99) with a range of 2250 to 1650 B.C. appear to correspond with those from the Maple Creek site (cf.McHugh and Michael 1984:27). As we are presently without radiocarbon dates from good context in the midden from the McKinley site, a temporal span of ca. 2750 to 1200 B.C.might best be applied to the McKinley site Late Archaic and the McWhinney Heavy Stemmed type.

Supporting evidence for a social and cultural connection between the McKinley site and sites in the central Ohio Valley comes from the lithic raw materials identified at McKinley. There are numerous glacial gravel cherts derived from Silurian and Devonian limestones in the lithic assemblage from the site. However, chert types which are known to derive specifically from sources outcropping to the southeast (Cantin n.d) are well represented at McKinley site. Cherts imported from these areas include Laurel, Marble Hill, Muldraugh, Jeffersonville, and a small amount of Wyandotte (see also Little 1970:27).

The final prehistoric occupation at the McKinley site relates to the late prehistoric, Oliver phase dating after A.D. 1000. This component represents an ephemeral occupation relating to a small community or camp established for unknown reasons. It is no doubt related to other late prehistoric sites recorded within a half mile radius of McKinley (12 H 2, 12 H 5, 12 H 41,and 12 H 44). Materials diagnostic of this occupation include thumbnail scrapers, triangular points of the general Madison type, and grit tempered, cord marked, and trailed ceramics. A number of sherds exhibit the curvilinear guilloche design motif which is typical of Oliver phase ceramics (Figure 7 a) .

At the McKinley site, there are some indications of a discrete cemetery area located on slightly higher ground on the north side of the excavation. In all, sixteen flexed and two extended burials were excavated. These were found throughout the vertical extent of the midden. Given the presence of Oliver phase cultural debris at the surface, and in some cases the upper levels of the McKinley site, we might suspect that, while many are probably Late Archaic, perhaps certain members of the burial population could be from the Oliver phase occupation. In one case a late prehistoric pot sherd was recovered from 1.2 feet b.s., indicating some intrusion into the Late Archaic midden. Unfortunately, there are no funerary artifacts at McKinley that allow clear temporal assignment. On the other hand, McWhinney Heavy Stemmed points are well represented in funerary context at the Rosenberger site located near Louisville (Collins 1979; Driskell 1979:Table 7.12) which begs explanation of their absence in inhumations at McKinley. Bone awls are present with burials at McKinley and, in one case, a turtle shell rattle was associated with a burial. Future collections research might approach the problem with Stable Carbon and Nitrogen Isotope analysis such as conducted by Schurr (1989) at the Angel Mounds site. This could be used to determine if corn may have been in the diet of individuals buried at the McKinley site. If this were true, it would place an interment in later prehistory, well-removed and disassociated from a Late Archaic component at the site. Of course, since the collection contains a wealth of charcoal samples, radiocarbon analysis should be performed to further answer questions of chronology and association.



                   References Cited 



Anslinger, C. Michael
	1988	Archaeological Excavations at the Middle-Late Archaic 
                 Bluegrass Site (12 W 162), Warrick County, Indiana.  
                 Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 97:97.

Anslinger, C. Michael
	1989	An Overview of Archaeological Excavations at the Bluegrass 
                 Site (12 W 162), Warrick County.  In Current Research in 
                 Indiana Archaeology and Prehistory: 1987-1988, edited by 
                 C. S. Peebles, pp. 4.  Indiana University, Glenn A. Black 
                 Laboratory of Archaeology, Research Reports No. 10, 
                 Bloomington, Indiana.

Cantin, Mark
	n.d.	Provenience, Description and Archaeological Use of 
                 Selected Indiana Cherts. Occasional Paper No. 1.  
                 Department of Anthropology, Indiana State University, 
                 Terre Haute.


Cook, Thomas Genn
	1976	Koster: An Artifact Analysis of Two Archaic Phases in 
                 West Central Illinois.  Northwestern University 
                 Archaeological Program, Prehistoric Records 1.

Collins,  Michael B. (editor)
	1979	Excavations at Four Archaic Sites in the Lower Ohio Valley, 
                 Jefferson County, Kentucky.  Department of Anthropology, 
                 University of Kentucky.  Occasional Papers in Anthropology 
                 No. 1, 2 Volumes, Lexington.

Driskell, Boyce N.
	1979	The Rosenberger Site (15 Jf 18).  In Excavations at Four 
                 Archaic Sites in the Lower Ohio Valley, Jefferson County, 
                 Kentucky, edited by Michael B.Collins, pp. 697-799.  
                 Department of Anthropology, University of Kentucky.
                 Occasional Papers in Anthropology No. 1, Lexington.

Geistweit, Barbara Ann
	1970	Archaic Manifestations in Ohio and the Ohio Valley.  
                 Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, 
                 The Ohio State University, Columbus.

Guernsey, E.Y.
	1939	Relationships Among Various Clark County Sites.  
                 Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 48:27-32.

	1942	The Culture Sequence of the Ohio Falls Sites.  Proceedings 
                 of the Indiana Academy of Science 51:60-67.

Jansen, Donald E.
	1977	An Examination of Late Archaic Development in the Falls 
                 of the Ohio Area. In For the Director: Research Essays 
                 in Honor of James B. Griffin, edited by Charles E. Cleland, 
                 pp. 123-143.  Anthropological Papers No. 61, Museum of 
                 Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Jefferies, Richard W.
	1987	The Archaeology of Carrier Mills: 10,000 Years in the 
                 Saline Valley of Illinois.  Center for Archaeological 
                 Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 
                 Carbondale, Illinois.

	1990	Archaic Period.  In The Archaeology of Kentucky: Past 
                 Accomplishments and Future Directions, Volume 1, edited 
                 by David Pollack, pp. 143 246.  State Historic Preservation 
                 Comprehensive Plan Report No. 1.  Kentucky Heritage Council, 
                 Frankfort.

Justice, Noel D.
	1987	Stone Age Spear and Arrow Points of the Midcontinental 
                 and Eastern United States.  Indiana University Press, 
                 Bloomington.

Kellar, James H.
	1955	The Atlatl in North America. Indiana Historical Society, 
                 Prehistory Research Series 3(3), Indianapolis.

Little, Robert M.
	1970	The McKinley Site.  Unpublished Master's thesis, Department 
                 of Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington.

McHugh, William P. and Ronald L. Michael
	1984	Archaeological Investigations at Sites 12 SW 89 and 12 SW 99, 
                 IPL Patriot Site, Switzerland County, Indiana.  
                 GAI Consultants, Inc.

Miller, Rex K.
	1941	McCain Site, Dubois County, Indiana.  Indiana Historical 
                 Society, Prehistory Research Series 2(1), Indianapolis.

Munson, Cheryl Ann and Thomas Genn Cook
	1980	Late Archaic French Lick Phase: A Dimensional Description.  
                 In Archaeological Salvage Excavations at Patoka Lake, 
                 Indiana: Prehistoric Occupations of the Upper Patoka 
                 River Valley, edited by C.A. Munson, pp.721-740. Indiana 
                 University, Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology -
                 Research Reports No 6, Bloomington, Indiana.

Schurr, Mark R.
	1989	The Relationship Between Mortuary Treatment and Diet at 
                 the Angel Site. Ph.D dissertation, Department of 
                 Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington. 
                 University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.

Vickery, Kent D.
	1972	Projectile Point Type Description: McWhinney Heavy Stemmed.  
                 Paper presented at the 29th Southeastern Archaeological 
                 Conference, Morgantown, West Virginia.

	1976	An Approach to Inferring Archaeological Site Variability.  
                 Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, 
                 Indiana University, Bloomington.

	1980	Preliminary Definition of Archaic "Study Units" in 
                 Southwestern Ohio. Prepared for the State Archaeological 
                 Preservation Plan Meeting, Columbus, Ohio.


Webb, William S.
	1946	Indian Knoll Site Oh 2, Ohio County, Kentucky.  The 
                 University of Kentucky Reports in Anthropology and 
                 Archaeology Vol. IV(3)Pt 1, Lexington.


Key to Figure 7 a. Rim sherd; finger impressed, curvilinear? guilloche- like design; grit temper. 7 1/2 L 2 1/2, depth 0-.4'. GBL 872/177. b. Net sinker; chipped and notched, sandstone. 3 R 2, feature 8, pit 3 or above, depth 1.0-1.2'. GBL 872/129. c. McWhinney Heavy Stemmed; heat treated glacial chert. 7 L 2, 2.4'+, zone A. GBL 872/567. d. McWhinney Heavy Stemmed; Fort Payne formation chert? 7 1/2 L 3, 2.4-2.8'. GBL 872/620. e. Antler projectile point fragment; shaped and drilled/reamed. 1.2-1.6'. GBL 872/974. f. Fish hook fragment; splinted deer? long bone, shaped. 7 L 3, 2.0-2.4', feature 12-2. GBL 872/635. g. Atlatl hook fragment; cut and shaped antler tine. 7 1/2 L 3 1/2, 2.0', shell layer. GBL 872/373. h. Unfinished shell disk bead; drilled and shaped mussel valve. 7 L 2, 2.4-2.8', shell layer. GBL 872/405. i. Shell disk bead; drilled and shaped to finish. 7 L 2, 2.8'+, in rock area or pit. GBL 872/448.


[return to 1993 abstracts menu] [continue to next]


Created: July 29, 1996
URL: http://www.gbl.indiana.edu/home.html
Comments: webmaster@www.gbl.indiana.edu
Copyright 1996, Glenn Black Laboratory of Archaeology and The Trustees of Indiana University
Last updated: September 15, 2003