Figures

Previous: References Cited Next: Appendix A: Results of remote sensing surveys Up: Contents

Figure 1: Physiographic map of Indiana showing the location of the Clampitt Site (12 Lr 329).
Figure 2: Map of the Clampitt Site showing the area of surface artifacts and local relief.
Figure 3: Map of the Clampitt Site showing areas of vegetation, cleared fields, and historic improvements.
Figure 4: Map of the Clampitt Site showing the location of magnetic survey grid numbers 1 through 8.
Figure 5: Map of the Clampitt Site showing the location of the surface collection grid.
Figure 6: Map of the Clampitt Site showing the areal distribution of pottery on the surface.
Figure 7: Map of the Clampitt Site showing the areal distribution of bone on the surface.
Figure 8: Map of the Clampitt Site showing the areal distribution of chert debitage on the surface.
Figure 9: Map of the Clampitt Site showing the areal distribution of fire-cracked rock on the surface.
Figure 10: Map of the Clampitt Site showing the areal distribution of limestone rock on the surface.
Figure 11: Map of the Clampitt Site showing the location of all excavation blocks.
Figure 12: Map of excavation units and trenches showing their field designations.
Figure 13: Map of excavation units, trenches, and cultural features.
Figure 13a: Detailed view of excavation units and features in the southwest quadrant of the Clampitt Site.
Figure 13b: Detailed view of excavation units and features in the southeast quadrant of the Clampitt Site.
Figure 13c: Detailed view of excavation units and features in the northwest quadrant of the Clampitt Site.
Figure 13d: Detailed view of excavation units and features in the northeast quadrant of the Clampitt Site.
Figure 14: Frequency distribution of feature form indices.
Figure 15: Selected profiles of basin-shaped features.
Figure 16: Selected profiles of flat-bottomed, basin-shaped features.
Figure 17: Selected profiles of cylindrical-shaped features.
Figure 18: Selected profiles of irregularly-shaped features.
Figure 19: Histogram showing comparative densities of feature artifacts.
Figure 20: Histogram comparing averaged densities of artifacts from plow zone, pit, and stockade trench contexts.
Figure 21: Map showing the distribution of midden lenses (cross-hatched areas) in excavation units and trenches.
Figure 22: Profile drawing of the north wall of Unit B.
Figure 23: Profile drawing of the south wall of Trench 24.
Figure 24: Histogram comparing artifact densities from Trenches 18 and 24.
Figure 25: Detailed plan map and profile of inner stockade trench (Feature 8) and related post molds.
Figure 26: Plan map and profile of Feature 51 in Trench 15.
Figure 27: Profile drawing of the east wall of Trench 15 and Feature 51.
Figure 28: Detailed plan map of Units EE and FF showing the opening in inner stockade line.
Figure 28a: Profile drawings of Features 57 and 59 at the opening of the inner stockade line.
Figure 28b: Profile drawing of post mold "screen" associated with Feature 59.
Figure 29: Profile drawing of the south wall of Unit X showing the pit containing Burial Feature 1.
Figure 30: Profile drawing of Feature 44.
Figure 31: Frequency distribution of pottery rim band heights.
Figure 32: Selected profiles of pottery rim sherds.
Figure 33: Cross-tabulations of ceramic motif and technique frequencies.
Figure 34: Histogram showing relative frequencies of triangular point types.
Figure 35: Histogram showing relative frequencies of triangular point raw material types.
Figure 36: Histogram showing relative distances to raw material sources.
Figure 37: Histogram showing comparative frequencies of floral remains from the 1991 excavation.
Figure 38: Radiocarbon determinations from the Clampitt Site.
Figure 39: Calibrated radiocarbon determinations from Oliver phase sites in Indiana.